From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Balmer v. Heck

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Sep 10, 2015
Case No. 3:13-cv-134-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Sep. 10, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 3:13-cv-134-KRG-KAP

09-10-2015

CHRISTOPHER BALMER, Plaintiff, v. CORRECTIONS OFFICERS MICHAEL HECK and JUSTIN ECKENRODE, Defendants


MEMORANDUM ORDER

This matter is before Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C.§ 636 and Local Rule 72 for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on August 3, 2015, docket no. 62, recommending that defendant Eckenrode's motion for summary judgment, docket no. 42, be granted.

The parties were notified that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1), they had fourteen days to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. No one has filed objections and the time to do so has expired.

After review of the record and the Report and Recommendation, and noting the lack of objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 10th day of September, 2015, it is

ORDERED that defendant Eckenrode's motion for summary judgement, docket no. 42, is granted. The Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court. The matter remains with the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.

BY THE COURT:

/s/_________

KIM R. GIBSON,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Notice by ECF to counsel of record and by U.S. Mail to:

Christopher Balmer GX-5754

S.C.I. Forest

P.O. Box 945

Marienville, PA 16239


Summaries of

Balmer v. Heck

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Sep 10, 2015
Case No. 3:13-cv-134-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Sep. 10, 2015)
Case details for

Balmer v. Heck

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER BALMER, Plaintiff, v. CORRECTIONS OFFICERS MICHAEL HECK and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Sep 10, 2015

Citations

Case No. 3:13-cv-134-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Sep. 10, 2015)