From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ballou v. Barber

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION
Nov 27, 2012
Action No. 7:12-cv-31 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Nov. 27, 2012)

Opinion

Action No. 7:12-cv-31 (HL)

11-27-2012

CURTIS RAY BALLOU, v. OFFICER BARBER and OFFICER BATES, Defendant.


ORDER

The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 33) has been read and considered and is, hereby, approved, adopted, and made the Order of the Court. The Objection of Plaintiff Curtis Ray Ballou (Doc. 34) has also been read and thoroughly considered and is found to be without merit. Though Plaintiff continues to allege in his Objection that he was unable to exhaust the grievance process because of Defendants' threats, Plaintiff does not present sufficient evidence to support his claim. Therefore, the Court finds that Plaintiff did not exhaust his administrative remedies and the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants is granted.

______________________

HUGH LAWSON, SENIOR JUDGE


Summaries of

Ballou v. Barber

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION
Nov 27, 2012
Action No. 7:12-cv-31 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Nov. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Ballou v. Barber

Case Details

Full title:CURTIS RAY BALLOU, v. OFFICER BARBER and OFFICER BATES, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION

Date published: Nov 27, 2012

Citations

Action No. 7:12-cv-31 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Nov. 27, 2012)