Opinion
2:23-cv-00135-GMN-DJA
02-01-2023
CHRISTOPHER BALLESTEROS, an individual, Plaintiff, v. GARRISON PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, d/b/a USAA, a foreign entity; DOES I through X; and ROE CORPORATIONS I through X, inclusive, Defendants.
SPENCER FANE, LLP Mary E. Bacon (Nevada Bar No. 12686) Attorneys for Defendant Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company CLAGGETT & SYKES LAW FIRM Brian Blankenship, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 11522 Scott E. Lundy, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 14235
SPENCER FANE, LLP
Mary E. Bacon (Nevada Bar No. 12686)
Attorneys for Defendant Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company
CLAGGETT & SYKES LAW FIRM
Brian Blankenship, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 11522
Scott E. Lundy, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 14235
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT GARRISON PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST)
DANIEL JALBREGTS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Plaintiff, Christopher Ballesteros (“Plaintiff”), and Defendant, Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company (“Defendant”) have agreed to extend the time for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint for three days, from January 31, 2023 to February 3, 2023. Plaintiff filed her amended complaint on January 3, 2023 and Defendant was served on January 10, 2023. This is the parties’ first stipulation to extend Defendant’s time to respond to the Amended Complaint.
The parties request this brief extension to accommodate evaluation of Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint, Defendant’s counsel being out of the office after the Amended Complaint was filed, and Defendant completing its evaluation of this matter. 1
This request is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED. 2