From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ballen v. Plaza Del Prado Condo

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 15, 1975
319 So. 2d 90 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

Opinion

No. 75-71.

September 16, 1975. Rehearing Denied October 15, 1975.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, John Red Lake, J.

Caidin, Rothenberg, Kogan, Kornblum Benjamin, Miami, for appellants.

Weissenborn, Burr Hyman and Gary M. Carman, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HAVERFIELD and NATHAN, JJ.


Two points are presented in this appeal by a defendant from a judgment of foreclosure. There is no showing in the briefs or the record that either question was ever presented to the trial court. Therefore, the judgment is affirmed upon the rule stated in Caldwell v. Peoples Bank of Sanford, 1917, 73 Fla. 1165, 75 So. 848. See also Lee County Oil Company v. Marshall, Fla.App. 1957, 98 So.2d 510, and the cases cited therein.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Ballen v. Plaza Del Prado Condo

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 15, 1975
319 So. 2d 90 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)
Case details for

Ballen v. Plaza Del Prado Condo

Case Details

Full title:IVIN BALLEN AND ROSE BALLEN, HIS WIFE, APPELLANTS, v. PLAZA DEL PRADO…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Oct 15, 1975

Citations

319 So. 2d 90 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

Citing Cases

S.L.H. Inv. Corp. v. K-Site 700 Assoc

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. All Florida Sur. Co. v. Coker, 88 So.2d 508 (Fla. 1956); Shore Inv. Co. v. Hotel…

Schatz v. Schatz

The point cannot present reversible error because the husband failed to raise the question in the trial…