From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ballen and Miller v. Gottlieb

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 4, 1976
52 A.D.2d 765 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

May 4, 1976


Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on January 8, 1976, denying, in part, plaintiff's motion to modify defendant's demand for a bill of particulars, unanimously modified, on the law and on the facts, to the extent of striking Item No. 3 from defendant's demand, without costs and without disbursements, and with leave to serve a proper demand. Plaintiff, in suing to recover an attorney's fee, based on quantum meruit, involving the conduct of a single case, is not seeking to recover solely on the basis of an agreed hourly rate. Hence defendant is not entitled to the details pertaining to each and every item of legal services claimed to have been performed, as sought by Item No. 3. It is entitled to enumeration of the general services performed and the over-all time spent thereon.

Concur — Stevens, P.J., Kupferman, Lupiano, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ.


Summaries of

Ballen and Miller v. Gottlieb

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 4, 1976
52 A.D.2d 765 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

Ballen and Miller v. Gottlieb

Case Details

Full title:McLAUGHLIN STERN, BALLEN AND MILLER, Appellant, v. GILBERT K. GOTTLIEB…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 4, 1976

Citations

52 A.D.2d 765 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Citing Cases

Nossen v. Ballinger

Plaintiff seeks to recover legal fees and disbursements from defendants for professional services rendered in…