From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Balle v. Martin's Seafood Restaurant

Supreme Court of Florida
Mar 9, 1966
183 So. 2d 688 (Fla. 1966)

Opinion

No. 34641.

March 9, 1966.

Writ of Certiorari to Florida Industrial Commission.

Williams Jabara, Miami, for petitioner and cross-respondent.

Wicker, Smith, Pyszka, Blomqvist Davant and Charles T. Kessler, Fort Lauderdale, for Federated Mut. Implement Hardware Ins. Co., respondent, cross-petitioner.

Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for Florida Industrial Commission, respondent.


By petition and cross-petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date June 30, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition and cross-petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition and cross-petition are therefore denied.

The petition for allowance of attorney's fees is hereby granted in the amount of $250.00.

THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

THORNAL, C.J., dissents.


Summaries of

Balle v. Martin's Seafood Restaurant

Supreme Court of Florida
Mar 9, 1966
183 So. 2d 688 (Fla. 1966)
Case details for

Balle v. Martin's Seafood Restaurant

Case Details

Full title:EARNEST A. BALLE, PETITIONER, CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. MARTIN'S SEAFOOD…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Mar 9, 1966

Citations

183 So. 2d 688 (Fla. 1966)