From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ballay v. State

United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Dec 12, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-10699, SECTION "A"(1) (E.D. La. Dec. 12, 2007)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-10699, SECTION "A"(1).

December 12, 2007


ORDER


The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, the objections filed by petitioner, and the state court record in this matter, will approve the Report and Recommendation and adopt it as its opinion in this matter. The Court recognizes the harsh sentence that petitioner received for a relatively minor offense. However, the Court can find no legal or factual basis upon which petitioner can rely to overcome the timeliness bar.

Accordingly;
IT IS ORDERED that the petition of John C. Ballay for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED with prejudice.

The Court makes no finding as to whether the petition, if timely, would present a cognizable federal claim.


Summaries of

Ballay v. State

United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Dec 12, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-10699, SECTION "A"(1) (E.D. La. Dec. 12, 2007)
Case details for

Ballay v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOHN C. BALLAY v. STATE OF LOUISIANA

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Date published: Dec 12, 2007

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-10699, SECTION "A"(1) (E.D. La. Dec. 12, 2007)

Citing Cases

Thomas v. Davis

The district court correctly determined that Hunter's § 2254 application was untimely."); Redmond v. Jackson,…

Smith v. Cain

"Article 930.8, which sets forth the limitations period and the exceptions thereto, is a provision of state…