From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ballast v. Workforce7 Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 4, 2022
20 Civ. 3812 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. May. 4, 2022)

Opinion

20 Civ. 3812 (ER)

05-04-2022

VICTOR BALLAST, LUIS SIMONE, and MARQUIS RICHARDSON, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. WORKFORCE7 INC., CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, VALI INDUSTRIES, INC., AND RONAD HILTON, Jointly and severally, Defendants.


ORDER

Edgardo Ramos, U.S.D.J.

On April 20, 2022, Defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (“Con Edison”), requested a conference on its intent to renew its motion to dismiss Plaintiff Marquis Richardson's claims. Doc. 240. On May 4, 2022, the hearing was held. Because Richardson has repeatedly failed to abide by Court orders and participate in Con Edison's requests for written discovery-and for the other reasons set forth on the record-the Court dismisses Richardson's claims with prejudice.

It is SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ballast v. Workforce7 Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 4, 2022
20 Civ. 3812 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. May. 4, 2022)
Case details for

Ballast v. Workforce7 Inc.

Case Details

Full title:VICTOR BALLAST, LUIS SIMONE, and MARQUIS RICHARDSON, Individually and On…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: May 4, 2022

Citations

20 Civ. 3812 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. May. 4, 2022)