From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ballard v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 6, 1984
447 So. 2d 1040 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

No. 83-46.

April 6, 1984.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Harry Lee Coe, III, J.

Jerry Hill, Public Defender, Bartow, and Amelia G. Brown, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert J. Landry, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


Defendant appeals from his conviction for shooting into an occupied dwelling in violation of section 790.19, Florida Statutes (1981), contending that the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the charge. We affirm.

In denying the motion to dismiss, the trial court disagreed with Golden v. State, 120 So.2d 651 (Fla. 1st DCA 1960). We agree with the trial court that on a motion to dismiss the element of wantonly shooting at or into a building is not negated by the pleaded facts that defendant fired at a man who was in front of the building. "Wantonly" does not require that the building be the target.

AFFIRMED.

OTT, C.J., and SCHOONOVER, J., concur.


Summaries of

Ballard v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 6, 1984
447 So. 2d 1040 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Ballard v. State

Case Details

Full title:CARL L. BALLARD, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Apr 6, 1984

Citations

447 So. 2d 1040 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Citing Cases

Carter v. State

J.T.K. v. State, 341 So.2d 229 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976), holds that evidence from a witness standing 100 yards…

State v. Kettell

Affirming the denial of a motion to dismiss, the district court held that "the element of wantonly shooting…