From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ballard v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Apr 14, 2015
No. 66645 (Nev. App. Apr. 14, 2015)

Opinion

No. 66645

04-14-2015

DANIEL BALLARD, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

This is an appeal from an order revoking probation and amended judgment of conviction. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Carolyn Ellsworth, Judge.

Appellant Daniel Ballard claims that the district court abused its discretion by revoking his probation. He asserts that his probation was revoked because he was not financially able to get the mental health and drug counseling he needed. This claim lacks merit. Because Ballard stipulated to the revocation of his probation without modification of his sentence, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion by revoking his probation. See Lewis v. State, 90 Nev. 436, 438, 529 P.2d 796, 797 (1974). Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

/s/_________, C.J.

Gibbons
/s/_________, J.
Tao
/s/_________, J.
Silver
cc: Hon. Carolyn Ellsworth, District Judge

Sandra L. Stewart

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Ballard v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Apr 14, 2015
No. 66645 (Nev. App. Apr. 14, 2015)
Case details for

Ballard v. State

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL BALLARD, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Apr 14, 2015

Citations

No. 66645 (Nev. App. Apr. 14, 2015)