Opinion
January Term, 1903.
Order of the County Court of Kings county affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
The County Court has awarded to the plaintiff full costs against the defendant executor under section 1836 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The order cannot be sustained on the ground that defendant did not seasonably file the consent provided for in section 1822 and in the section cited, because the suit was begun only eight days after the claim was rejected by the executor, whereas the executor has five months and twenty days after the rejection to file the necessary consent. ( Hart v. Hart, 45 App. Div. 280.) It would seem, therefore, that the order must have been based upon the alternative proposition that the payment of the claim was unreasonably resisted or neglected, and we cannot say that the learned county judge erred in so holding. The motion was based not alone upon an affidavit of the plaintiff's attorney, but upon all the proceedings in the action. These proceedings are not before us, but were presumably in the mind of the learned trial judge at the time he entertained and decided the motion. The circumstances of the trial may well have shown that the suit was unreasonably defended, and as we cannot indulge in any presumption to the contrary, the order should be affirmed. Goodrich, P.J., Woodward, Hirschberg and Jenks, JJ., concurred.