From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ball v. State of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 27, 1984
463 N.E.2d 1231 (N.Y. 1984)

Opinion

Decided March 27, 1984

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, Robert M. Quigley, J.

John J. Keigher for appellants.

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General ( Peter J. Dooley and Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.


On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), orders of reversal affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memoranda at the Appellate Division ( 96 A.D.2d 1139, 1140). The Appellate Division order dismissing claimant's appeal from the nonfinal Court of Claims order dated September 27, 1982 is treated as one of affirmance (see, e.g., Matter of Town of Islip [ Mascioli], 49 N.Y.2d 354, 358, n 1); and the appeal from that order is dismissed upon the ground that the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER, SIMONS and KAYE.


Summaries of

Ball v. State of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 27, 1984
463 N.E.2d 1231 (N.Y. 1984)
Case details for

Ball v. State of New York

Case Details

Full title:ESTELLA C. BALL, Appellant, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent. (Appeal No…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 27, 1984

Citations

463 N.E.2d 1231 (N.Y. 1984)
463 N.E.2d 1231
475 N.Y.S.2d 379

Citing Cases

Scheemaker v. State

Whether claimant's injuries were proximately caused in part by the State's negligence presented questions of…

Long v. Cleary

Plaintiff, however, presented no proof that such markings were required under the New York Manual of Uniform…