Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

Ball v. Shockley

No. W2009-01774-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Oct. 12, 2010)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
Ball v. Shockley

2 Citing cases

  1. Berge v. Warlick

    No. M2018-00767-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Jan. 3, 2019)   Cited 1 times

    Id. at *6. Likewise, in Ball v. Shockley, No. W2009-01774-COA-R3-CV, 2010 WL 3984727 (Tenn. Ct. App. Oct. 12, 2010), the trial court granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment after the plaintiff's attorney failed to file a response and appear at the hearing. Id. at *1.

  2. In re T.M.S.

    No. W2012-02220-COA-R3-JV (Tenn. Ct. App. Jul. 8, 2013)   Cited 4 times
    Holding that for purposes of appeal, there was no VAP because it was not included in the record and no other competent evidence was presented to show its existence

    2000)).Ball v. Shockley, No. W2009-01774-COA-R3-CV, 2010 WL 3984727, at *3 (Tenn. Ct. App. Oct. 12, 2010). Rule 60.02 of the Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure states in its entirety: