From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ball v. D'Addio

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 16, 2012
Civil No. 1:12-cv-815 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 16, 2012)

Opinion

Civil No. 1:12-cv-815

08-16-2012

DAWN BALL, Plaintiff v. LISA D' ADDIO, et al. Defendants


(Chief Judge Kane)


(Magistrate Judge Carlson)


ORDER

THE BACKGROUND OF THIS ORDER IS AS FOLLOWS:

On May 4, 2012, Magistrate Judge Carlson issued a Report and Recommendation in which he recommended that Plaintiff's complaint be dismissed without prejudice because the claims raised in the complaint were identical to the claims raised in a prior case. (Doc. No. 7.) Having received no objections, this Court adopted the Report and Recommendation on June 1, 2012. (Doc. No. 11.) The Court cautioned Plaintiff that failure to file an amended complaint would result in the Court directing the Clerk of Court to close the case. (Id.) Although Plaintiff has filed multiple documents in this case since the Court's June 1, 2012 order, she has not endeavored to amend her complaint. On July 10, 2012, Judge Carlson recommended the complaint be dismissed with prejudice. (Doc. No. 20.) In response, Plaintiff filed objections in which she raises issues regarding being confined in a strip cell "on and off between April and June. (Doc. No. 22.) Upon a review of Plaintiff s complaint, the Court must agree with Judge Carlson's assessment of Plaintiff s claims. Plaintiff's complaint is nothing more than an effort to re-assert claims that have been raised in a prior action. This matter is, in short, a quintessential example of a frivolous complaint.

ACCORDINGLY, on this 16th day of August 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 20) is ADOPTED and Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous for failure to state a claim. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.

_________________

Yvette Kane, Chief Judge

United States District Court

Middle District of Pennsylvania


Summaries of

Ball v. D'Addio

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 16, 2012
Civil No. 1:12-cv-815 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 16, 2012)
Case details for

Ball v. D'Addio

Case Details

Full title:DAWN BALL, Plaintiff v. LISA D' ADDIO, et al. Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 16, 2012

Citations

Civil No. 1:12-cv-815 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 16, 2012)

Citing Cases

Ball v. Famiglio

Three of those dismissals do not count as strikes because they were not final when Ball filed the appeals…