From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ball v. D'Addio

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jun 1, 2012
Civil No. 1:12-cv-815 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 1, 2012)

Opinion

Civil No. 1:12-cv-815

06-01-2012

DAWN BALL, Plaintiff v. LISA D' ADDIO, et al. Defendants


(Chief Judge Kane)


(Magistrate Judge Carlson)


ORDER

NOW, on this 1st day of June 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT upon review of Magistrate Judge Carlson's May 4, 2012 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 7), and no timely objections being filed, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Carlson.
2. Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED and Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice.
3. Plaintiff shall have twenty (20) days to amend her complaint. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint in the time specified, the Clerk of Court will be directed to close the case.

_________________________

Yvette Kane, Chief Judge

United States District Court

Middle District of Pennsylvania


Summaries of

Ball v. D'Addio

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jun 1, 2012
Civil No. 1:12-cv-815 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 1, 2012)
Case details for

Ball v. D'Addio

Case Details

Full title:DAWN BALL, Plaintiff v. LISA D' ADDIO, et al. Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jun 1, 2012

Citations

Civil No. 1:12-cv-815 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 1, 2012)