From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ball v. Craver

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jun 12, 2012
Civil No. 1:11-CV-1831 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 12, 2012)

Opinion

Civil No. 1:11-CV-1831

06-12-2012

DAWN MARIE BALL, Plaintiff v. CRAVER, et al., Defendants


(Chief Judge Kane)


(Magistrate Judge Carlson)


ORDER

THE BACKGROUND OF THIS ORDER IS AS FOLLOWS:

On March 28, 2012, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint. (Doc. No. 61.) On May 22, 2012, Magistrate Judge Martin Carlson issued a Report and Recommendation in which he recommended that the motion to dismiss be granted and that the case be dismissed with prejudice. (Doc. No. 74.) Objections to the Report and Recommendation were due June 8, 2012. To date, no objections have been filed. The Court has conducted a de novo review of Judge Carlson's Report and Recommendation and has detected no error therein.

ACCORDINGLY, on this 12th day of June 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 74) is ADOPTED, the motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 61) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.

_______________

Yvette Kane, Chief Judge

United States District Court

Middle District of Pennsylvania


Summaries of

Ball v. Craver

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jun 12, 2012
Civil No. 1:11-CV-1831 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 12, 2012)
Case details for

Ball v. Craver

Case Details

Full title:DAWN MARIE BALL, Plaintiff v. CRAVER, et al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jun 12, 2012

Citations

Civil No. 1:11-CV-1831 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 12, 2012)