From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ball v. Campbell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jun 1, 2012
Civil No. 1:11-cv-2239 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 1, 2012)

Opinion

Civil No. 1:11-cv-2239

06-01-2012

DAWN BALL, Plaintiff v. SGT. CAMPBELL, et al. Defendants


(Chief Judge Kane)


(Magistrate Judge Carlson)


ORDER

NOW, on this 1st day of June 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT upon review of Magistrate Judge Carlson's May 4, 2012 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 34), and no timely objections being filed, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Carlson.
2. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with prejudice as frivolous for failure to state a claim.
3. The Clerk of Court shall close the file.

_________________________

Yvette Kane, Chief Judge

United States District Court

Middle District of Pennsylvania


Summaries of

Ball v. Campbell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jun 1, 2012
Civil No. 1:11-cv-2239 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 1, 2012)
Case details for

Ball v. Campbell

Case Details

Full title:DAWN BALL, Plaintiff v. SGT. CAMPBELL, et al. Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jun 1, 2012

Citations

Civil No. 1:11-cv-2239 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 1, 2012)

Citing Cases

Ball v. Famiglio

Three of those dismissals do not count as strikes because they were not final when Ball filed the appeals…