From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ball v. Barr

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 23, 2012
Civil No. 1:11-CV-2240 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 23, 2012)

Opinion

Civil No. 1:11-CV-2240

03-23-2012

DAWN MARIE BALL, Plaintiff v. S. KERNS BARR, et al., Defendants


(Chief Judge Kane)

(Magistrate Judge Carlson)

ORDER

THE BACKGROUND OF THIS ORDER IS AS FOLLOWS:

On February 16, 2012, Plaintiff Dawn Marie Ball filed a letter with the Court indicating that she wished to "drop case # 11-2240." (Doc. No. 24.) On February 17, 2012, Magistrate Judge Martin Carlson issued a Report and Recommendation in which he recommended that this Court construe the letter as a motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(I) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. No. 25.) The time for filing and objection to the Report and Recommendation has passed, and Plaintiff has not filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation.

ACCORDINGLY, on this 23rd day of March 2012, upon a de novo review of the Report and Recommendation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 25) is ADOPTED, Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed, and the Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.

_______________

Yvette Kane, Chief Judge

United States District Court

Middle District of Pennsylvania


Summaries of

Ball v. Barr

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 23, 2012
Civil No. 1:11-CV-2240 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 23, 2012)
Case details for

Ball v. Barr

Case Details

Full title:DAWN MARIE BALL, Plaintiff v. S. KERNS BARR, et al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Mar 23, 2012

Citations

Civil No. 1:11-CV-2240 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 23, 2012)