Opinion
24381-21
02-22-2023
MATTHEW BALKUS & JACKIE BALKUS, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
ORDER
KATHLEEN KERRIGAN, CHIEF JUDGE.
On March 23, 2022, respondent filed in the above-docketed case a Motion To Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction as to Jackie Balkus, on the ground that no statutory notice of deficiency, as authorized by section 6212 and required by section 6213(a) of the Internal Revenue Code (I.R.C.) to form the basis for a petition to this Court, had been sent to petitioner Jackie Balkus with respect to taxable year 2018, nor had respondent made any other determination with respect to Jackie Balkus's tax year 2018 that would confer jurisdiction on this Court, as of the date the petition herein was filed. Although the Court directed petitioners to file an objection, if any, to respondent's motion to dismiss, petitioners have failed to do so. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that respondent's Motion To Dismiss For Lack of Jurisdiction as to Jackie Balkus is granted. This case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as to Jackie Balkus, and references in the petition to Jackie Balkus are deemed stricken. It is further
ORDERED that the caption of this case is amended to read "Matthew Balkus, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent".