From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Balikes v. Speleos

Supreme Court of Florida
Jan 6, 1967
193 So. 2d 434 (Fla. 1967)

Opinion

No. 34456.

January 6, 1967.

Writ of Certiorari to the District Court of Appeal, Third District.

Richard E. Gerstein, State Atty., and Joseph Durant, Asst. State Atty., for petitioners.

Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender, and Phillip A. Hubbart, Asst. Public Defender, for respondent.


Through petition for writ of certiorari, there has been presented before us for review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, reported at 173 So.2d 735, affirming the judgment of the circuit court in its granting of rule absolute in prohibition. We issued the writ, and the cause was argued both on jurisdiction and on the merits. After having heard oral argument and having considered the petition, the record, and the briefs of the parties, we have concluded that this court is without jurisdiction to review the cause, there being no direct conflict as required by the Constitution of Florida, Article V, Section 4(2), F.S.A. Accordingly, the writ of certiorari which we have previously issued is discharged and the cause dismissed.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C.J., O'CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., and KANNER (Retired), District Court Judge, concur.

ERVIN, J., dissents.


Summaries of

Balikes v. Speleos

Supreme Court of Florida
Jan 6, 1967
193 So. 2d 434 (Fla. 1967)
Case details for

Balikes v. Speleos

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS N. BALIKES ET AL., PETITIONERS, v. GEORGE T. SPELEOS, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jan 6, 1967

Citations

193 So. 2d 434 (Fla. 1967)

Citing Cases

State v. Jones

Whidden v. State, 159 Fla. at 694, 32 So.2d at 579. See also Balikes v. Speleos, 173 So.2d 735 (Fla. 3d DCA…

State v. Gellis

Annot., 147 A.L.R. 991 (1943). Compare Balikes v. Speleos, 173 So.2d 735 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965), cert. den. 193…