There was no effective substitution for the plaintiff as required by CPLR 1015 prior to the issuance of either of the orders. Thus, the orders appealed from are nullities and this court has no jurisdiction to entertain the appeals (see,Balestra v. Donohue, 237 A.D.2d 237; Wilson v. Rosen, 166 A.D.2d 441). SANTUCCI, J.P., THOMPSON, JOY, and McGINITY, JJ., concur.
There was no effective substitution for the plaintiff as required by CPLR 1015 prior to the issuance of either of the orders. Thus, the orders appealed from are nullities and this court has no jurisdiction to entertain the appeals ( see, Balestra v. Donohue, 237 A.D.2d 237; Wilson v. Rosen, 166 A.D.2d 441). SANTUCCI, J.P., THOMPSON, JOY, and McGINITY, JJ., concur.