Baldwin v. Voyles

Full title: JOHN BALDWIN, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. ANTHONY J. VOYLES, ET AL., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Aug 30, 2007

Civ. No. 07-1265 (WHW) (D.N.J. Aug. 30, 2007)

Opinion

Civ. No. 07-1265 (WHW).

August 30, 2007

ORDER

WILLIAM WALLS, District Judge

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs John Baldwin's and Sharon Baldwin's motion to remand the suit to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Middlesex County, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). The Court referred the matter to Magistrate Judge Madeline C. Arelo for a Report and Recommendation.

Having considered the written submissions of the parties and having heard oral argument of the parties on August 2, 2007, Magistrate Judge Arleo recommended that Plaintiffs' motion to remand be denied. No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed. Upon a review of the Report and Recommendation, the Court is satisfied that it is not clearly erroneous. Rather, Magistrate Judge Arleo's conclusions are well-supported.

For the reasons set forth on the record on August 2, 2007 before Magistrate Judge Arleo and for good cause shown;

ORDERED that the Court approves and adopts the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Arleo in its entirety; and it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiffs' motion to remand is DENIED.