From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baldwin v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Aug 28, 2012
374 S.W.3d 397 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. WD 74009.

2012-08-28

James D. BALDWIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, Brian C. Wimes, Judge. Susan E. Summers, for Appellant. Richard A. Starnes, for Respondent.


Appeal from the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, Brian C. Wimes, Judge.
Susan E. Summers, for Appellant. Richard A. Starnes, for Respondent.
Before Division Two: JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Presiding Judge, ALOK AHUJA, Judge and MARK D. PFEIFFER, Judge.

ORDER


PER CURIAM:

Appellant James D. Baldwin appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. A formal, published opinion would have no jurisprudential value; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Baldwin v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Aug 28, 2012
374 S.W.3d 397 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Baldwin v. State

Case Details

Full title:James D. BALDWIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Aug 28, 2012

Citations

374 S.W.3d 397 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)