From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baldwin v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jun 14, 1977
237 S.E.2d 3 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977)

Opinion

53806, 53807.

ARGUED MAY 9, 1977.

DECIDED JUNE 14, 1977. REHEARING DENIED JULY 8, 1977.

Arson; denial of bond. Crisp Superior Court. Before Judge Gregory.

Benjamin Zeesman, for appellant.

D. E. Turk, District Attorney, for appellee.


The defendant appeals his conviction for arson in the first degree. Held:

1. In 53807 the defendant contends the court erred in failing to grant bail. The defendant's petition for bail had been remanded to the trial judge by this court for a hearing pursuant to Birge v. State, 238 Ga. 88 ( 230 S.E.2d 895). After remand, the trial judge, acting in compliance with our directive, applied the principles of Birge, supra, and denied bail. We find no errors of law in his ruling.

2. In 53806 the defendant enumerates as error the failure to try him within the time specified in Code § 70-402. It is argued that after reversal by this court in Baldwin v. State, 137 Ga. App. 32 ( 223 S.E.2d 10), the state violated the Code section by not trying the defendant within the next term after receipt of the remittitur.

In view of the showing made in this regard and Code § 70-404, we find no merit in this contention.

3. The defendant's enumeration of error complaining that a witness should not have been allowed to testify because of his omission from the original list of witnesses is without merit. Knowledge of the investigating officer is not imputable to the district attorney. Evans v. State, 227 Ga. 571, 576 ( 181 S.E.2d 845); Scott v. State, 230 Ga. 413, 414 (1) ( 197 S.E.2d 338); Mahar v. State, 137 Ga. App. 116, 121 (3) ( 223 S.E.2d 204).

4. "When a trial judge has made a determination as to the voluntariness of a confession after a suppression hearing, such determination must be accepted by the appellate courts unless his decision is clearly erroneous." Gibbs v. State, 235 Ga. 480, 483 ( 220 S.E.2d 254).

5. "A sentence is not cruel and inhumane within the constitutional inhibition so long as it is within the statutory limit." Bearden v. State of Georgia, 122 Ga. App. 25 (1) ( 176 S.E.2d 243). Accord, Kincaid v. State, 137 Ga. App. 138, 140 (4) ( 223 S.E.2d 152); Watkins v. State, 138 Ga. App. 160, 161 ( 225 S.E.2d 739); Dixon v. State, 231 Ga. 33 (8) ( 200 S.E.2d 138); Goughf v. State, 232 Ga. 178, 182 (3) ( 205 S.E.2d 844); Jones v. State, 232 Ga. 771, 776 ( 208 S.E.2d 825).

6. The remaining enumerations of error are without merit.

Judgment affirmed. Shulman and Banke, JJ., concur.

ARGUED MAY 9, 1977 — DECIDED JUNE 14, 1977 — REHEARING DENIED JULY 8, 1977.


Summaries of

Baldwin v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jun 14, 1977
237 S.E.2d 3 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977)
Case details for

Baldwin v. State

Case Details

Full title:BALDWIN v. THE STATE (two cases)

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jun 14, 1977

Citations

237 S.E.2d 3 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977)
237 S.E.2d 3