Opinion
March, 1908.
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. All concurred, except Kellogg, J., dissenting.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Baldwin v. Schenectady Railway Company
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 1, 1908
125 App. Div. 912 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)
Summaries of
Baldwin v. Schenectady Railway Company
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 1, 1908
125 App. Div. 912 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)
Case details for
Baldwin v. Schenectady Railway Company
Case Details
Full title:Charles E. Baldwin, Respondent, v. Schenectady Railway Company, Appellant
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Date published: Mar 1, 1908
Citations
125 App. Div. 912 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)