From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Balderas v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Aug 15, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:11cv414 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 15, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:11cv414 Grim. No. 6:06cr27

08-15-2012

SIMON BALDERAS JR. #12840-078 v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA


MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

AND ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT

The Movant Simon Balderas, proceeding through counsel, filed this motion to vacate or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. §2255, complaining of the validity of his conviction. This Court ordered that the matter be referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1) and (3) and the Amended Order for the Adoption of Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to United States Magistrate Judges.

Balderas was convicted in a jury trial on 24 counts, including charges of conspiracy to distribute drugs, possession with intent to distribute drugs, and possession of a firearm in the furtherance of a drug trafficking crime. After re-sentencing upon remand from the Fifth Circuit, Balderas received a sentence of 922 months in prison.

In his motion to vacate or correct sentence, Balderas raised 25 grounds for relief, centering around allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel prior to trial, at trial, at sentencing, and on appeal. The Government was ordered to respond to the motion, and Balderas filed a reply to this response.

After review of the pleadings and the trial records, the Magistrate Judge issued a lengthy and comprehensive Report recommending that the motion to vacate or correct sentence be denied. The Magistrate Judge also recommended that Balderas be denied a certificate of appealability sua sponte. Balderas has not filed objections to this Report; accordingly, he is barred from de novo review by the district judge of those findings, conclusions, and recommendations and, except upon grounds of plain error, from appellate review of the unobjected-to factual findings and legal conclusions accepted and adopted by the district court. Douglass v. United Services Automobile Association, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc).

The Court has carefully reviewed the pleadings and records in this cause, as well as the Report of the Magistrate Judge. Upon such review, the Court has concluded that the Report of the Magistrate Judge is correct. It is accordingly

ORDERED that the Report of the Magistrate Judge (docket no. 16) is hereby ADOPTED as the opinion of the District Court. It is further

ORDERED that the above-styled motion to vacate or correct sentence is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. It is further

ORDERED that the Movant Simon Balderas Jr. is hereby DENIED a certificate of appealability sua sponte. Finally, it is

ORDERED that any and all motions which may be pending in this civil action are hereby DENIED.

______________________

LEONARD DAVIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Balderas v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Aug 15, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:11cv414 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 15, 2012)
Case details for

Balderas v. United States

Case Details

Full title:SIMON BALDERAS JR. #12840-078 v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Date published: Aug 15, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:11cv414 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 15, 2012)

Citing Cases

United States v. Freeman

As such, the evidence against Freeman was "so overwhelming" that the testimony in question was unlikely to…