From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baldenegro v. Naylor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jun 21, 2012
1:11-cv-3038-CL (D. Or. Jun. 21, 2012)

Opinion

1:11-cv-3038-CL

06-21-2012

JOSE DAVID VALDEZ BALDENEGRO, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL NAYLOR; DAN CONVERSE; JOE FERGUSON; and JACKSON COUNTY JUVENILE SERVICES, Defendants,


ORDER

PANNER, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation (#36) and the matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Defendants filed objections and I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). I find no error and adopt the report (#36).

Success on plaintiff's claims would not "necessarily imply the invalidity of his conviction or sentence[.]" See Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 487 (1994). Plaintiff's sentence included a term of probation "not to exceed 5 years" as stated in the November 21, 2002 Order of Commitment to the Department of Human Services. The May 1, 2009 Order stating plaintiff's "probation is hereby terminated" was not plaintiff's conviction or sentence. Heck v. Humphrey does not bar plaintiff's claims.

I adopt the Report and Recommendation (#36). Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (#32) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________________

OWEN M. PANNER

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Baldenegro v. Naylor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jun 21, 2012
1:11-cv-3038-CL (D. Or. Jun. 21, 2012)
Case details for

Baldenegro v. Naylor

Case Details

Full title:JOSE DAVID VALDEZ BALDENEGRO, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL NAYLOR; DAN CONVERSE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Jun 21, 2012

Citations

1:11-cv-3038-CL (D. Or. Jun. 21, 2012)