Opinion
January, 1918.
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concurred, except Foote and Merrell, JJ., who dissented.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
BALD v. KUHNERT
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 1, 1918
182 App. Div. 912 (N.Y. App. Div. 1918)
Summaries of
BALD v. KUHNERT
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 1, 1918
182 App. Div. 912 (N.Y. App. Div. 1918)
Case details for
BALD v. KUHNERT
Case Details
Full title:DOROTHY K. BALD, an Infant, etc., Respondent, v. FREDERICK A. KUHNERT…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Date published: Jan 1, 1918
Citations
182 App. Div. 912 (N.Y. App. Div. 1918)
Citing Cases
Behrman v. Pioneer Pearl Button Co.
The very purpose of the amendment was to avoid a multiplicity of motions and to enable the court to dispose…