Balch v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon

Full title: Sherman BALCH, Appellant, v. The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, et al., Appellee.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Date published: Mar 9, 2022

335 So. 3d 141 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. 4D21-0959

03-09-2022

Sherman BALCH, Appellant, v. The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, et al., Appellee.

Sherman Balch, Palm City, pro se. Hallie S. Evans of Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders, LLP, Atlanta, Georgia, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Sherman Balch, Palm City, pro se.

Hallie S. Evans of Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders, LLP, Atlanta, Georgia, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Affirmed . See Inv. Tr. Servs., LLC v. DLJ Mortg. Cap., Inc. , 225 So. 3d 833, 833 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017) (stating that "[t]he law is well settled that a purchaser pendente lite is not entitled to intervene or otherwise be made a party to the ongoing lawsuit"); Intermediary Fin. Corp. v. McKay , 93 Fla. 101, 111 So. 531, 531 (1927) (explaining that "[t]his court is committed to the doctrine that a purchaser pendente lite is not entitled to intervene").

Conner, C.J., Gross and May, JJ., concur.