From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Balaban v. New Terminal Warehouse Corp.

Supreme Court of Texas
Sep 12, 1980
605 S.W.2d 855 (Tex. 1980)

Opinion

No. B-8861.

July 23, 1980. Rehearing Denied September 12, 1980.

Appeal from District Court No. 215, Harris County; Wallace, Judge.

Talbert, Giessel Stone, Alice Giessel and Henry P. Giessel, Eastham, Watson, Dale Forney, John P. Forney, Jr., Fulbright Jaworski, Frank G. Jones, Jamail Kolius, Joseph D. Jamail, Houston, for petitioners.

Vinson Elkins, Knox D. Nunnally and Ann Lewis, Houston, for respondents.


The applications for writ of error in this case were granted in connection with a companion case, B B Auto Supply, Sand Pit, Trucking Co. v. Central Freight Lines, Inc., 603 S.W.2d 814 (Tex. 1980), handed down this same day. We granted the writs in these two cases to consider whether in light of the policies behind the enactment of Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 2212a (Vernon), a common law right of indemnity exists between joint tortfeasors in negligence cases. The Houston (14th Dist.) Court of Civil Appeals in the present case held that New Terminal was not required to indemnify its co-tortfeasors, Galena Park Trucking Co., Leon Stevens, and Myrko Balaban. New Terminal Warehouse Corp. v. Wilson, Tex.Civ.App., 589 S.W.2d 465. In B B Auto Supply, supra, we held that the common law right of indemnity is no longer available between joint tortfeasors in a negligence case. Therefore, the order of this court of April 30, 1980, granting the applications for writ of error is withdrawn as having been improvidently granted, and both applications in this case are refused, no reversible error.


Summaries of

Balaban v. New Terminal Warehouse Corp.

Supreme Court of Texas
Sep 12, 1980
605 S.W.2d 855 (Tex. 1980)
Case details for

Balaban v. New Terminal Warehouse Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Mykro BALABAN, Jr., et al., Petitioners, v. NEW TERMINAL WAREHOUSE…

Court:Supreme Court of Texas

Date published: Sep 12, 1980

Citations

605 S.W.2d 855 (Tex. 1980)

Citing Cases

Schultz v. Rural/Metro Corp.

In proving the existence of an agency relationship, it is essential to show that the alleged principle has…

Mayo v. Tri-Bell Industries, Inc.

Texas courts have construed the state modified comparative negligence statute, art. 2212a, to bar recovery by…