From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bakke v. Kane

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 26, 2007
256 F. App'x 110 (9th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 06-55576.

Argued and Submitted October 19, 2007.

Filed November 26, 2007.

Michael David Bakke, Soledad, CA, pro se.

Kenneth M. Stern, Esq., Law Offices of Kenneth M. Stern, Woodland Hills, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Douglas P. Danzig, Esq., Office of the California Attorney General, San Diego, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Terry J. Hatter, District Judge, Presiding. DC No. CV 05-00294 TJH.

Before: KOZINSKI, TASHIMA, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Michael David Bakke ("Bakke") appeals the district court's dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus as barred by the one-year statute of limitations of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 ("AEDPA"). See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). On appeal, Bakke contends that he is entitled to equitable tolling due to mental incompetency, or, at the least, an evidentiary hearing to establish his mental incompetency. Although mental incompetency is an "extraordinary circumstance" that may justify equitable tolling of the AEDPA's statute of limitations, see Laws v. Lamarque, 351 F.3d 919, 922-23 (9th Cir. 2003), this case is squarely governed by Gaston v. Palmer, 417 F.3d 1030, 1034-35 (9th Cir. 2005), amended by 447 F.3d 1165 (9th Cir. 2006). Therefore, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Bakke v. Kane

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 26, 2007
256 F. App'x 110 (9th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

Bakke v. Kane

Case Details

Full title:Michael David BAKKE, Petitioner — Appellant, v. Anthony P. KANE, Warden…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Nov 26, 2007

Citations

256 F. App'x 110 (9th Cir. 2007)