From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bakkar v. Wolf

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Nov 24, 2020
CIVIL DOCKET NO. 1:20-CV-01278-P (W.D. La. Nov. 24, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL DOCKET NO. 1:20-CV-01278-P

11-24-2020

IBRAHIM MAHMMOUD HASSAN BAKKAR, Petitioner v. CHAD WOLF, ET AL, Respondent


MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOSEPH H.L. PEREZ-MONTES

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein (ECF No. 5), noting the absence of objection thereto, and concurring with the Magistrate Judge's findings under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (ECF No. 1) is DENIED.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED in Chambers, this 24th day of November, 2020.

/s/_________

DAVID C. JOSEPH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Bakkar v. Wolf

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Nov 24, 2020
CIVIL DOCKET NO. 1:20-CV-01278-P (W.D. La. Nov. 24, 2020)
Case details for

Bakkar v. Wolf

Case Details

Full title:IBRAHIM MAHMMOUD HASSAN BAKKAR, Petitioner v. CHAD WOLF, ET AL, Respondent

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

Date published: Nov 24, 2020

Citations

CIVIL DOCKET NO. 1:20-CV-01278-P (W.D. La. Nov. 24, 2020)