From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bakhtiar v. Yates

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION
Nov 28, 2012
Case Number: 1: 11-cv-00102-AWI-JLT (E.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2012)

Opinion

Case Number: 1: 11-cv-00102-AWI-JLT

11-28-2012

MORTEZA BAKHTIAR, Plaintiff, v. JAMES A. YATES, et. al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL

On July 30, 2012, the parties filed a stipulated request for dismissal pursuant to the Court's order, requesting that the Court retain jurisdiction over the action for 240 days from the bankruptcy court's order approving the settlement and attached thereto the terms of the settlement agreement which were incorporated by reference therein.

Having reviewed and considered the stipulated request for dismissal, and finding no just cause for delay, this Court ORDERS the above action dismissed under the following terms and conditions:

1. This Court shall retain jurisdiction over the action for 240 days from
the date of service on Defendants' counsel of the bankruptcy order either approving or rejecting the settlement; and
2. That the terms of the settlement agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit A, be incorporated into this Court's Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Bakhtiar v. Yates

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION
Nov 28, 2012
Case Number: 1: 11-cv-00102-AWI-JLT (E.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2012)
Case details for

Bakhtiar v. Yates

Case Details

Full title:MORTEZA BAKHTIAR, Plaintiff, v. JAMES A. YATES, et. al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION

Date published: Nov 28, 2012

Citations

Case Number: 1: 11-cv-00102-AWI-JLT (E.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2012)