Bakewell v. Streaming Sols.

Full title: DONALD BAKEWELL, Plaintiff, v. STREAMING SOLUTIONS LLC, Defendant.

Court: United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Aug 25, 2022

2:22-cv-00911-JCM-DJA (D. Nev. Aug. 25, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-00911-JCM-DJA

08-25-2022

DONALD BAKEWELL, Plaintiff, v. STREAMING SOLUTIONS LLC, Defendant.

GILE LAW GROUP, LTD. Ryan Gile, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff Donald Bakewell CARMAN COONEY FORBUSH PLLC Sean D. Cooney, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant Streaming Solutions, LLC

(First Request)

GILE LAW GROUP, LTD.

Ryan Gile, Esq.

Attorney for Plaintiff Donald Bakewell

CARMAN COONEY FORBUSH PLLC

Sean D. Cooney, Esq.

Attorneys for Defendant

Streaming Solutions, LLC

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS

Plaintiff Donald Bakewell (“Plaintiff”), by and through his counsel of record, and Defendant Streaming Solutions, LLC (“Defendant”), by and through its counsel of record, hereby stipulate to extend the time for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (ECF No. 8) (the “Motion to Dismiss”) to September 26, 2022, in order to accommodate Plaintiff's need for additional time to prepare its briefing as well as preexisting travel plans by the parties' counsel.

Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (ECF No. 8) was filed on August 12, 2022, which makes the current deadline for filing a response to the Motion on August 26, 2022. Plaintiff requires additional time to prepare its response to the Motion. In addition, Plaintiff's counsel is scheduled to be traveling out of the country beginning on August 28^th through September 22^nd and Defendant's counsel is scheduled to be traveling out of the country beginning on September 11^th through September 23^rd. In order to accommodate Plaintiff's request for additional time to prepare its response to the Motion and the subsequent overseas travel schedules of both parties' counsel, the parties have stipulated and agreed to this extension of time.

For these reasons, the extension sought is supported by good cause and not for purposes of delay or any other bad faith purpose. This is the first request for an extension of time to respond to this Motion.

Accordingly, the deadline for Plaintiff to file its response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction shall be extended such that the new deadline for the response is September 26, 2022. The deadline for any reply thereto shall be October 3, 2022.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED:

GLG-30644 2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on August 25, 2022, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I further certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document is being served via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF to all participants in the case who are registered CM/ECF users.