From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baker v. Tolliver

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 20, 2013
No. 2:13-cv-0686 WBS DAD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:13-cv-0686 WBS DAD P

12-20-2013

JERRY W. BAKER, Plaintiff, v. TOLLIVER et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By an order filed November 8, 2013, plaintiff was ordered to file an in forma pauperis affidavit or pay the appropriate filing fee within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court's order and has not filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the appropriate filing fee.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

________________

DALE A. DROZD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DAD:9
bake0686.fifp


Summaries of

Baker v. Tolliver

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 20, 2013
No. 2:13-cv-0686 WBS DAD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2013)
Case details for

Baker v. Tolliver

Case Details

Full title:JERRY W. BAKER, Plaintiff, v. TOLLIVER et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 20, 2013

Citations

No. 2:13-cv-0686 WBS DAD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2013)