From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baker v. Tanori

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 5, 2024
23-cv-04391-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2024)

Opinion

23-cv-04391-WHO (PR)

08-05-2024

TIMOTHY RAY BAKER, Plaintiff, v. C. TANORI, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

DKT. NOS. 17, 18 AND 19

WILLIAM H. ORRICK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff Baker's motion for voluntary dismissal without prejudice is GRANTED. (Dkt. No. 18.) Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2).

Because this dismissal is without prejudice, Baker may move to reopen. Any motion to reopen must have the words MOTION TO REOPEN written on the first page.

The Clerk shall terminate all pending motions, enter judgment in favor of defendants, and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED. |


Summaries of

Baker v. Tanori

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 5, 2024
23-cv-04391-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2024)
Case details for

Baker v. Tanori

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY RAY BAKER, Plaintiff, v. C. TANORI, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 5, 2024

Citations

23-cv-04391-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2024)