From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baker v. Steele

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Feb 17, 2015
No. 4:14-CV-333-JAR (E.D. Mo. Feb. 17, 2015)

Opinion

No. 4:14-CV-333-JAR

02-17-2015

BARRY BAKER, Plaintiff, v. TROY STEELE, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Supplement Sur-Reply (Doc. 41). In his motion, Plaintiff requests that Court allow him to supplement his sur-reply on the limited issue of exhaustion. However, Plaintiff has not filed a sur-reply. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Supplement his Sur-Reply (Doc. 41) is GRANTED, in part. To the extent the Court construes Plaintiff's Motion as a Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply, Plaintiff may file a sur-reply on or before March 3, 2015. Plaintiff may, at that time, include the arguments and exhibit he has included in his current Motion. Dated this 17th day of February, 2015.

/s/ _________

JOHN A. ROSS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Baker v. Steele

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Feb 17, 2015
No. 4:14-CV-333-JAR (E.D. Mo. Feb. 17, 2015)
Case details for

Baker v. Steele

Case Details

Full title:BARRY BAKER, Plaintiff, v. TROY STEELE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 17, 2015

Citations

No. 4:14-CV-333-JAR (E.D. Mo. Feb. 17, 2015)