Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

Baker v. State

217 So. 2d 880 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
Baker v. State

8 Citing cases

  1. Baker v. Wainwright

    422 F.2d 145 (5th Cir. 1970)   Cited 44 times
    In Baker codefendants were represented by the same counsel. The State introduced a confession of one defendant implicating the other.

    " Baker v. State, 217 So.2d 880 (Fla.App. 1969). Relying on the Florida Appellate Court's ruling, the District Judge refused the writ.

  2. Hall v. State

    381 So. 2d 683 (Fla. 1980)   Cited 16 times
    In Hall v. State, 381 So.2d 683 (Fla. 1979), we held that statements or confessions made by a co-defendant are inadmissible as evidence against defendant at the guilt phase of the trial.

    Appellee suggests that Bruton and Douglas are distinguishable because in this case Hoy denied having made the statements which implicated appellant. Rather, posits appellee, this case is controlled by Baker v. State, 217 So.2d 880 (Fla. 1st DCA 1969), where the District Court of Appeal, First District, opined: The codefendant, by taking the witness stand and denying ever having made the oral confession testified to by the police officers [which implicated the defendant in the crime], removed any valid objection by appellant to the admission of the confession, and absolved the court from any error in its ruling thereon.

  3. Morgan v. State

    550 So. 2d 151 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)   Cited 9 times

    They have also failed to point out specific instances in which an actual conflict of interest affected their attorney's representation. Foster v. State, 387 So.2d 344 (Fla. 1980); Boutwell v. State, 530 So.2d 1092 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 538 So.2d 1255 (Fla. 1988); Davis v. State, 461 So.2d 291 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Baker v. State, 217 So.2d 880 (Fla. 1st DCA 1969); Rogers v. State, 212 So.2d 367 (Fla. 1st DCA 1968), cert. discharged, 219 So.2d 685 (Fla. 1969); see also Bellows v. State, 508 So.2d 1330 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). Furthermore, counsel was not court appointed, but was privately retained. Because they chose dual representation, appellants may not now complain.

  4. Foskey v. State

    223 So. 2d 335 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

    Therefore, the order appealed is hereby affirmed. Wellington v. Wainwright, 214 So.2d 28 (Fla.App. 1st, 1968); Baker v. State, 217 So.2d 880 (Fla.App. 1st, 1969). WIGGINTON C.J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

  5. Foxworth v. State

    220 So. 2d 396 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

    The record on appeal and briefs having been read and given full consideration and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order appealed is hereby affirmed. Dunbar v. State, 214 So.2d 52 (Fla.App.2d 1968); Baker v. State, 217 So.2d 880, opinion filed January 23, 1969 (Fla.App.1st). WIGGINTON, C.J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

  6. Yates v. State

    219 So. 2d 61 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

    The record on appeal and briefs having been read and given full consideration and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the Order appealed is hereby affirmed. McCray v. State, 181 So.2d 729 (Fla.App. 1st, 1966); Wellington v. Wainwright, 214 So.2d 28 (Fla.App. 1st, 1968); Baker v. State, 217 So.2d 880 (Fla. App.) opinion filed January 23, 1969. WIGGINTON, C.J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

  7. Holman v. State

    219 So. 2d 46 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

    The record on appeal and the briefs filed having been read and given full consideration and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the Order appealed is hereby affirmed. Wellington v. Wainwright, 214 So.2d 28 (Fla.App.1st, 1968); Baker v. State, 217 So.2d 880, filed January 23, 1969 (Fla.App.1st, 1969). WIGGINTON, C.J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

  8. Martin v. State

    218 So. 2d 778 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

    The record on appeal and the briefs having been read and given full consideration and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court is hereby affirmed. Wellington v. Wainwright, 214 So.2d 28 (Fla.App. 1st, 1968); Baker v. State (Fla.App. 1st, 1969), 217 So.2d 880, Opinion filed January 23, 1969, not yet reported. WIGGINTON, C.J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.