From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 3, 2000
756 So. 2d 1091 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 3D98-2650.

Opinion filed May 3, 2000.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Roberto M. Pineiro, Judge, L.T. Nos. 91-7940, 91-8184, 91-15763.

Michael James Baker, in proper person.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Christine E. Zahralban, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and SHEVIN, J., and NESBITT, Senior Judge.


On Motion to Enforce Mandate

Defendant seeks enforcement of this court's mandate in Baker v. State, 736 So.2d 807 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). As the state properly concedes, the trial court failed to vacate the sentences and to resentence defendant on counts 2 and 3 of case number 91-7940, count 2 in case number 91-8184, and counts 1, 2, and 3 of case number 91-15763. In its corrected sentencing order, the trial court must mark the appropriate boxes for jail and prison credit and forward the sentencing documents to the Department of Corrections for recalculation of defendant's tentative release date.

Motion to enforce granted.


Summaries of

Baker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 3, 2000
756 So. 2d 1091 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Baker v. State

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL BAKER a/k/a JAMES BAKER, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF FLORIDA…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: May 3, 2000

Citations

756 So. 2d 1091 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

Howard v. State

Therefore, this cause is remanded for entry of a sentencing order crediting the defendant with the 276 days…

Baker v. State

PER CURIAM. Although various efforts have been made to do so, the trial court has not yet entered sentences…