Opinion
No. 2D16–774.
08-03-2016
Willis Baker, pro se.
Willis Baker, pro se.
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.801(b) ; Long v. State, 529 So.2d 286 (Fla.1988) ; Dominguez v. State, 98 So.3d 198 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) ; Guilford v. State, 88 So.3d 998 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) ; Hughes v. State, 22 So.3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) ; Waiter v. State, 965 So.2d 861 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) ; Steward v. State, 931 So.2d 133 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) ; Shortridge v. State, 884 So.2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) ; Boyd v. State, 880 So.2d 726 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) ; Cook v. State, 816 So.2d 773 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) ; Anderson v. State, 779 So.2d 345 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) ; Haynes v. State, 106 So.3d 481 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013) ; Sanchez v. State, 979 So.2d 1004 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) ; Clayton v. State, 904 So.2d 660 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) ; Lynch v. State, 881 So.2d 93 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) ; Gutierrez v. State, 854 So.2d 218 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) ; Labadie v. State, 840 So.2d 332 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) ; Paul v. State, 830 So.2d 953 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) ; Edwards v. State, 743 So.2d 76 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999).
LaROSE, SLEET, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.