From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Mar 12, 2014
133 So. 3d 1209 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. 2D13–2491.

2014-03-12

Edward BAKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Pat Siracusa, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Maggie Jo Hilliard, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jonathan P. Hurley, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Pat Siracusa, Judge.
Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Maggie Jo Hilliard, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jonathan P. Hurley, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
KHOUZAM, Judge.

Edward Baker appeals his judgment and sentence entered after his probation was revoked. The conditions of probation listed in the amended revocation order do not appear to conform to the circuit court's oral findings regarding which conditions Baker violated. Because a violation of any of these conditions would justify revocation,we affirm. However, we remand for the amended revocation order to be corrected to list the conditions that Baker was found to have violated.

Affirmed; remanded with directions. ALTENBERND and BLACK, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Baker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Mar 12, 2014
133 So. 3d 1209 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

Baker v. State

Case Details

Full title:Edward BAKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Date published: Mar 12, 2014

Citations

133 So. 3d 1209 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

Citing Cases

Coopersmith v. State

However, we remand for the order of revocation to be corrected to list the conditions that Coopersmith was…