From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baker v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Mar 31, 1948
209 S.W.2d 769 (Tex. Crim. App. 1948)

Opinion

No. 23992.

Delivered March 31, 1948.

1. — Adult Probation and Parole Law — Discretion of Court.

The matter of according one accused of an offense the benefit of the Adult Probation and Parole Law rests entirely in the discretion of the trial court.

2. — Adult Probation and Parole Law — Failure to Accord Benefits — No Appeal.

There is no provision of law authorizing an appeal because trial court declines to accord the benefit of the Adult Probation and Parole Law.

3. — Adult Probation and Parole Law — Appeal — Allowed in Two Instances.

Appeal may be taken in connection with Adult Probation and Parole Law in only two instances — first, where the parole is granted, one may appeal from the conviction, and, second, where the parole granted has been revoked.

Appeal from District Court of Potter County. Hon. Henry S. Bishop, Judge.

Appeal from conviction for robbery by assault; penalty, confinement in the penitentiary for five years.

Affirmed.

H. H. Cooper, of Amarillo, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State's Attorney, of Austin, for the State.


The offense is robbery by assault. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of five years.

The question of the sufficiency of the evidence is not raised and such could not be successfully maintained under the facts of the case. The only question presented for review relates to the court's action in declining to accord him the benefit of the Adult Probation and Parole Law. This matter rests entirely within the sound discretion of the trial court, and it seems that appellant realizes this but claims that the trial court abused his discretion with respect thereto because on the hearing of his application for probation, he proved that he was past seventeen and under eighteen years of age; that he had never theretofore been charged with an offense; that he was a good and obedient negro boy; that his parents were good negroes; that this evidence was not controverted but notwithstanding the evidence touching his good conduct, the court declined to accord him the benefit of the Adult Probation and Parole Law. See Art. 781-b, Vernon's Ann. C. C. P.

There is no provision made in Art. 781-b, Vernon's Ann. C. C. P. for an appeal to this court in the event the trial court declines to accord to one convicted of an offense the benefit of the Adult Probation and Parole Law. There are only two instances in which an appeal may be taken, first, when the accused has been convicted and granted a parole he may nevertheless appeal from the judgment of conviction, and second, where he had been placed on probation or parole, after conviction, and his parole has been revoked.

From what we have said it follows that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed and it is so ordered.

Opinion approved by the Court.


Summaries of

Baker v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Mar 31, 1948
209 S.W.2d 769 (Tex. Crim. App. 1948)
Case details for

Baker v. State

Case Details

Full title:LEON BAKER v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Mar 31, 1948

Citations

209 S.W.2d 769 (Tex. Crim. App. 1948)
209 S.W.2d 769

Citing Cases

Wilson v. State

To this action of the court appellant excepted and gave notice of appeal to this court. The right to appeal…

Williams v. State

See TEX. CONST. art. I, § 19. "The decision whether to grant probation is wholly discretionary and…