From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baker v. Sproul

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Jan 8, 1930
37 F.2d 938 (3d Cir. 1930)

Opinion

No. 4184.

January 8, 1930.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania; Nelson McVicar, Judge.

For opinion below, see 37 F.2d 937.

Lowrie C. Barton, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellant.

Alter, Wright Barron, Stonecipher Ralston, and Frank W. Stonecipher, all of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellee.

Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.


This case is an attempt to have this court reverse a finding of fact by a referee which has been approved by the court below. The appellant, Baker, bid $100,000 for certain assets sold by a trustee in bankruptcy at auction. They were knocked down to him at his bid. He contends he withdrew his bid before they were so knocked down. The trustee contends to the contrary. That question of fact was tried out by the referee, witnesses pro and con were heard, and he found as a fact, after a careful analysis of the proofs and the character of the several witnesses, that Baker had not withdrawn his bid. On certificate by the referee, the court in a careful opinion reached the same conclusion. A study of the proofs by the members of this court leads it to the same conclusion.

The order of the court below is therefore affirmed.


Summaries of

Baker v. Sproul

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Jan 8, 1930
37 F.2d 938 (3d Cir. 1930)
Case details for

Baker v. Sproul

Case Details

Full title:Charles E. BAKER, Appellant, v. Robert C. SPROUL, Trustee in Bankruptcy of…

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Jan 8, 1930

Citations

37 F.2d 938 (3d Cir. 1930)