From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baker v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 2, 2008
No. CIV S-06-0307 GEB DAD P (E.D. Cal. May. 2, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-0307 GEB DAD P.

May 2, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has filed "objections" to respondents' answer. Petitioner contends that the fourth claim of his habeas petition is properly before this court and that the California Supreme Court denied his state habeas petition presenting that claim on March 19, 2008. Petitioner is informed that this action is proceeding only with respect to the first and second claims set forth in his petition. See Findings and Recommendations filed Oct. 12, 2007 and Order filed Nov. 30, 2007. Petitioner's objections will be disregarded and the court will grant him an extension of time to file his traverse to respondents' answer.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Within thirty days from the service of this order, petitioner shall file his traverse; and

2. Petitioner's objections to the answer, filed on April 24, 2008, shall be placed in the file and disregarded.


Summaries of

Baker v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 2, 2008
No. CIV S-06-0307 GEB DAD P (E.D. Cal. May. 2, 2008)
Case details for

Baker v. Runnels

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES EDWARD BAKER, JR., Petitioner, v. DAVID L. RUNNELS, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 2, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-06-0307 GEB DAD P (E.D. Cal. May. 2, 2008)