From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baker v. Perez

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jan 4, 2012
2:09-cv-2757 MCE KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2012)

Opinion

          Michael Baker, Plaintiff, represented by Michael Baker, K-76592, "CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON, CORCORAN (3481)", Pro Se.

          Roxanne M. Miller, Defendant, represented by Jarhett Patrick Blonien, Attorney General's Office.

          Dorothy Swingle, Defendant, represented by Jarhett Patrick Blonien, Attorney General's Office.

          Dr. Medina, Defendant, represented by Jarhett Patrick Blonien, Attorney General's Office.

          Ms. St. Laurant, Defendant, represented by Jarhett Patrick Blonien, Attorney General's Office.

          Mr. Bowers, Defendant, represented by Jarhett Patrick Blonien. Attorney General's Office.


          ORDER

          KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.

         On December 29, 2011, the Honorable Morrison C. England denied plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of the undersigned's order filed December 1, 2011. On January 3, 2011, the undersigned denied plaintiff's motion to compel and for sanctions. Under these circumstances, it is now appropriate to re-set the time for plaintiff's filing of his opposition to defendants' summary judgment motion.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's opposition to defendants' summary judgment motion is due within thirty days of the date of this order.


Summaries of

Baker v. Perez

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jan 4, 2012
2:09-cv-2757 MCE KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2012)
Case details for

Baker v. Perez

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL BAKER, Plaintiff, v. PEREZ, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 4, 2012

Citations

2:09-cv-2757 MCE KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2012)