From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baker v. Perez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 4, 2012
No. 2: 09-cv-2757 MCE KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2: 09-cv-2757 MCE KJN P

01-04-2012

MICHAEL BAKER, Plaintiff, v. PEREZ, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

On December 29, 2011, the Honorable Morrison C. England denied plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of the undersigned's order filed December 1, 2011. On January 3, 2011, the undersigned denied plaintiff's motion to compel and for sanctions. Under these circumstances, it is now appropriate to re-set the time for plaintiff's filing of his opposition to defendants' summary judgment motion.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's opposition to defendants' summary judgment motion is due within thirty days of the date of this order.

____________________________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Baker v. Perez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 4, 2012
No. 2: 09-cv-2757 MCE KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2012)
Case details for

Baker v. Perez

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL BAKER, Plaintiff, v. PEREZ, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 4, 2012

Citations

No. 2: 09-cv-2757 MCE KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2012)