From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baker v. Murphy

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
May 19, 2022
338 So. 3d 898 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. 4D21-3034

05-19-2022

Brandace BAKER, Appellant, v. Robert P. MURPHY, ACD Holdings, LLC, Louis Devaleix, an individual, Valeo Resources LLC, a Florida limited liability company, Reditas Medical Billing LLC, a Florida limited liability company, ETR3 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Harmony Recovery Centers, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, Valeo Labforce Personnel, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, ETR-3, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, Paragon Diagnostics, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, Melior Health Partners, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, Appellees.

Kevin F. Richardson of Clyatt & Richardson, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant. Daniel Desouza of Desouza Law, P.A., Coral Springs, for appellee Robert P. Murphy.


Kevin F. Richardson of Clyatt & Richardson, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Daniel Desouza of Desouza Law, P.A., Coral Springs, for appellee Robert P. Murphy.

Per Curiam.

Affirmed.

Levine, Forst and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Baker v. Murphy

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
May 19, 2022
338 So. 3d 898 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Baker v. Murphy

Case Details

Full title:Brandace BAKER, Appellant, v. Robert P. MURPHY, ACD Holdings, LLC, Louis…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Date published: May 19, 2022

Citations

338 So. 3d 898 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)