Opinion
No. 12–35946.
2015-03-18
Seth BAKER; Matthew Danzig; James Jarrett; Nathan Marlow; Mark Risk, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation, Defendant–Appellee.
Benjamin Gould (argued), Mark A. Griffin , and Amy C. Williams-Derry , Keller Rohrback LLP, Seattle, WA; Paul L. Stritmatter , Stritmatter Kessler Whelan Coluccio, Hoquiam, WA; Brad J. Moore , Stritmatter Kessler Whelan Coluccio, Seattle, WA; Robert L. Esensten , Wasserman, Comden, Casselman & Esensten, LLP, Tarzana, CA; Darren T. Kaplan , Darren Kaplan Law Firm, P.C., New York, NY; Gregory E. Keller , Chitwood Harley Harnes LLP, Atlanta, GA; and Jeffrey M. Ostrow , Kopelowitz Ostrow Ferguson Weiselberg Keechl, Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Plaintiffs-Appellants. Stephen M. Rummage (argued), Frederick B. Burnside , and John Goldmark , Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, Seattle, WA; Charles B. Casper , Patrick T. Ryan , Jennifer E. Canfield , Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads, LLP, Philadelphia, PA, for Defendant-Appellee.
Editor's Note: The opinion of the United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, in Baker v. Microsoft Corp., published in the advance sheet at this citation, 785 F.3d 315, was withdrawn from the bound volume because it was amended and superseded on denial of rehearing en banc July 20, 2015. For superseding opinion, see 2015 WL 4393964.