From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baker v. Marsh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 30, 2012
No. 2:12-cv-0553-KJM-JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-0553-KJM-JFM (PC)

08-30-2012

JERRY W. BAKER, Plaintiff, v. MARSH, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed July 9, 2012, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

__________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Baker v. Marsh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 30, 2012
No. 2:12-cv-0553-KJM-JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2012)
Case details for

Baker v. Marsh

Case Details

Full title:JERRY W. BAKER, Plaintiff, v. MARSH, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 30, 2012

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-0553-KJM-JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2012)