From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baker v. Marsh

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 12, 2011
No. CIV S-10-0985 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 12, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-0985 JAM CKD P.

September 12, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 31, 2011, defendants moved to modify the scheduling order. (Dkt. No. 29.) As defendants assert that plaintiff has completely failed to respond to discovery requests, and defendants' motion to compel is pending, the court will vacate the scheduling order issued March 15, 2011, and refrain from setting new deadlines until the discovery motion is resolved.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants' motion to modify the scheduling order (Dkt. No. 29) is granted; and
2. The March 15, 2011 scheduling order (Dkt. No. 22) is vacated.


Summaries of

Baker v. Marsh

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 12, 2011
No. CIV S-10-0985 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 12, 2011)
Case details for

Baker v. Marsh

Case Details

Full title:JERRY W. BAKER, Plaintiff, v. MARSH, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 12, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-0985 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 12, 2011)